Do you need a Heart Rate Monitor or a Fitness Tracker?

Last week my Dad asked me about HRM and just today I saw a FB friend asking about what she should replace her FitBit with.  The question for both my dad and friend are what are you looking to do with the technology?   Do you want to monitor HR, calories, steps? 

We will:

Define HRM

HRM vs fitness tracker

Why Monitor your HR

Types of HRM and Accuracy

What I use and recommend for Dad

Heart Rate Monitor, HRM, Defined

HRM is a piece of wearable technology that reads your heart rate, also known as your pulse.  Today there are activity trackers and heart rate monitors together in one piece of wearable technology.  

These duo devices have their place but if you are looking for reliable HR data I don’t recommend the duo devices.  

Polar is the grandfather of HRM technology.  I actually remember my first HRM, it was an A1,  I believe.  It included a chest strap and a wrist watch. The chest strap read your pulse and sent the information to the wrist watch.  It worked great as long as you were not running with a friend who also had a HRM.  The display was big and the numbers were bold, as a teenager I didn’t appreciate that I like do now.  

HRM vs. Fitness Tracker

Lets’ quickly discuss the difference between a HRM and Fitness tracker.  A HRM reads your heart rate, a fitness tracker tracks your steps, your active minutes, and maybe flights of stairs. Ok here is where it gets a little tricky, a fitness tracker may have the ability to monitor your HR and a HRM may have a the ability to track your activity.  Like I stated earlier I don’t recommend one unit to do both.  Let a fitness tracker track your activity and let a HRM track your HR.  The reason being, most fitness trackers will use optical technology to determine your HR. There are many limitations to this technology, which we will get into. 

Why Monitor your HR  

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
I was fortunate to travel to New Mexico and spend a few days at Polar Headquarters back in the early 2000’s.   Here we are a bunch of HRM data geeks checking out data during a hike.

People monitor their HR for various reasons.  

  1. Endurance training/Zone Training
  2. Motivation/calories
  3. Doctors orders
  4. Fun

Whatever your reason, I feel if you are looking at your HR you are looking for accurate information.  What is the point of monitoring your HR if you can not be confident the information?

Accuracy comes down to which technology you are using to monitor you HR.

There are basically two types of  technology we can use to read your HR. The old school,  chest strap or the fairly newer technology, the optical light.

The Old School- Chest Strap

The chest strap is by far the most accurate, most have the accuracy of ECG readings.  Specifically the The Polar H7 Bluetooth chest strap has been shown (in a paper published in JAMA Cardiology) to have the accuracy of an ECG.  (note the H7 has been replaced by the H10) 

There are some drawbacks to the HR chest strap.  Some people find the chest strap uncomfortable.  Personally I forget it’s even there, and I have had clients leave a session wearing my HR strap, because we both forget they had it on.  Then there are some who complain that is causes chaffing.  That one I can totally relate too. Back when I was quite the endurance queen I had a permanent mark in the middle of my chest.  Nothing serious, just needed a little Aquaphore ointment.  

In the old days the chest strap would send a signal to a watch worn on the wrist and this would be how you read your HR.

Today many people opt to have a HR chest strap that is bluetooth enabled and read the HR via an app on your phone.

A few quick tips to know about your chest strap.

  1. Always disconnect it, leaving it connected will run down the battery.
  2. Always get the electrodes wet before using it
  3. Some models are available in various colors which makes finding your HR strap in your gym bag much much easier! 

The Newer Option – LED Optic lights on your wrist unit

Many of your activity trackers, and your Apple watch all use green LED lights to detect the amount of blood flow thru your wrist.  When your heart beats, the blood flow in your wrist is greater and the green light is then absorbed more.   The HR is determined by measuring the changes in the amount of green light that is absorbed.  There are a bunch of fancy algorithms that help it do this. 

The accuracy of  products that use light to sense your blood flow to then determine your HR is very limited.   You may have heard the FitBit (a popular activity tracker that has some models that read HR) has had lawsuits filed against them because the HR readings have been found to be so inaccurate. According to  Consumers Report  It’s not that their technology is worse than other green LED products but their advertising was inaccurate and made too big of claims.

According to,  David Wright CEO of myZone,

“…the thing with a lot of these optical blood flow wearables. If you’re just walking and running then they have good algorithms to get rid of light and movement artifacts, but if the intensity is a lot higher, above 160 beats, then the blood passing is so fast that when you add movement as well, it becomes really difficult to get the right reading”

It does not matter if your wrist worn activity tracker is made by Apple, FitBit, Polar or Garmin, the optic technology that these units use has been found to be somewhat accurate for walking or jogging at a steady state, but not accurate for weight training or or interval training.

What do I use and recommend for Dad

I love my Apple Watch, it is a fitness tracker, it tracks my steps, how much I sit, how IMG_7986active I am, and I can look at my HR during a dog walk or even during a workout.  I just know that when I look at my HR during a workout it will be wrong.   Although they say the the green led light technology is supposed to be pretty good during walking and steady state exercise I don’t  find it to be too reliable even while walking Kami, our 9 year old Vizsla. 

 

When I go do a cycle class in a few hours, I will be wearing my Bluetooth HRM, that connects to my iPhone and I will be using the  CardioCoach App which has my HR zones from my metabolic test.   Metabolic Testing? What’s that?

Many serious endurance athletes will still opt for a chest strap and actually wrist unit that provides a lot of analytics and data that endurance athlete thrive on.  For the rest of us, a bluetooth chest strap that works with an app on your phone will probably do the trick and save you some money.  Most bluetooth HR chest straps are less than $100.  

For my dad, a former serious endurance athlete himself that still goes to the gym 3x week and does cardio and resistance training, I recommend the Polar H10 strap for $89.95. 

Since Dad is not running the trails and roads anymore but sticking inside on cardio equipment using his phone during a workout should be not be hassle.  If he finds he does not want take his phone with him into the gym area (he does pretty good on his phone but he is not as attached as a young millennial) then he can try the Garmin Forerunner 25 bundle.  It has a chest heart rate strap and when you are just using it as a watch it tracks your steps and activity.  

So if you are  just looking to track your steps and your activity, go with an Activity Tracker, like a a FitBit. If you are looking to do track steps, activity, and your HR. I recommend a chest strap for monitoring your HR.  You can still you your Apple Watch, or your FitBit that you wear on your wrist, but I would not recommend using these tools to  monitor your HR.

One thought on “Do you need a Heart Rate Monitor or a Fitness Tracker?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s